Disposed¶16

Nathi Ram v. Haryana Tourism Corporation and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC17 Jul 2026CWP/13735/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nathi Ram v. Haryana Tourism Corporation; CWP-13735-2009 (O&M); Punjab & Haryana High Court; writ petition disposed of on limited prayer for release of Rs. 2.5 lacs under policy per impugned order Annexure P-6; six-month time-bound direction to consider and decide claim; decision after notice and hearing; reasoned adverse order; liberty to seek legal redress; no merits commented upon.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's restricted claim for release of Rs.2.5 lacs in terms of the policy (as observed in Annexure P-6) within 6 months, after notice and hearing, granting the benefit forthwith if found entitled; liberty to seek legal redress against any adverse reasoned order. ¶16

Nathi Ram Vs Haryana Tourism Corporation and Anr. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents should release Rs.2.5 lacs to the petitioner in a time bound manner, in terms of the policy as observed in the impugned order (Annexure P-6), the claim having been restricted to this limited prayer.

¶15

Court's answer

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's claim within a period of 6 months in a just, fair and reasonable manner.

¶16

Ratio / Principle

The decision on the claim is to be taken after notice and hearing offered to the petitioner, and if he is found entitled, the benefit is to be granted forthwith.

¶16

Key takeaways

If the order on the claim is adverse to the petitioner's interest, it shall contain reasons, and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.ratio¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Punjab & Haryana High Court (Aman Chaudhary, J.; oral order dated 17.07.2026): In CWP-13735-2009 (O&M), Nathi Ram v. Haryana Tourism Corporation and Another, learned counsel for the petitioner restricted the claim to a direction for release of Rs.2.5 lacs payable to the petitioner in terms of the policy as observed in the impugned order (Annexure P-6), in a time bound manner. Learned State counsel raised no objection to the limited prayer. Without commenting on the merits, the Court disposed of the petition directing the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's claim within six months in a just, fair and reasonable manner, after notice and hearing, granting the benefit forthwith if found entitled; any adverse order must be reasoned, with liberty to the petitioner to seek legal redress.

Nathi Ram v. Haryana Tourism Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nathi Ram v. Haryana Tourism Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishan Vs the State of Haryana and Others

Pala Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Harikesh Kumar Vs State of Haryana through the Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana

Suresh Kumar & Ors. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Satish Kumar and Ors. Vs Uhbvn Ltd. and Ors.

Nahar Singh Vs Director General of Police Haryana and Ors.