The Hon'ble Single Judge disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on the grounds of the efflux of time.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous. Any pending miscellaneous application was also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
212
Rohtash & ors. ...... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana & ors. ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present :- Mr. B.S.Patwalia, Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Jagota, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. DAG, Haryana
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with the efflux
of time, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off as infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed
off.
( PANKAJ JAIN ) 13.07.2026 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.14 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 1 of 1
Rohtash & ors.
State of Haryana & ors.
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
