Mukesh Kumar v. State of Haryana through
Case brief
What is this about?
CWP-22462-2026, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, decision date 23.07.2026, single judge Nidhi Gupta J. (oral). Petitioners: Mukesh Kumar and others (counsel RK Girdhwal for Sandeep Yadav); Respondents: State of Haryana and another. Subject: challenge under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India to Speaking Order dated 18.06.2026 (Annexure P-16 Colly.) by respondent No. 4 terminating services of petitioner engaged through (HKRNL) as Helper on alleged ground of non-availability of sanctioned vacant posts, with consequential relieving order. Disposition: dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars; pending applications disposed of. Keywords: HKRNL, Helper, termination of services, sanctioned vacant posts, withdrawal, fresh petition.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars; pending application(s), if any, disposed of.