Shinjini Sharma v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn by consent after amicable settlement between the parties.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ petition withdrawn by consent after amicable settlement between the parties.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
102
CWP-1849-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision : May 08, 2026
SHINJINI SHARMA -PETITIONER
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present: Mr. Saurabh Singla, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) for the petitioner. (Through V.C.)
Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Vijay Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Pardeep Solath, Advocate for the respondents No.3 and 4.
KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
CM-7182-CWP-2026 AND CM-7183-CWP-2026
CWP-1849-2021
| May 08, 2026 | (KU | LDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| devinder | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | : | Yes/No |
DEVINDER YADAV 2026.05.08 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Shinjini Sharma
State of Haryana and Others
Kuldeep Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court