Dismissed¶¶17

Pankaj Bajaj v. Union Territory, Chandigarh and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC29 May 2026CWP/18214/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; CWP-18214-2025 (O & M); Pankaj Bajaj vs Union Territory, Chandigarh and Ors; decision dated 29.05.2026; coram Suvir Sehgal and Vikas Suri JJ; withdrawal of writ petition; application CM-8790-CWP-2026 disposed of; petition dismissed as withdrawn; preponement of hearing from 15.09.2026; respondents not represented; purely procedural order, no merits adjudicated, no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; application CM-8790-CWP-2026 disposed of and the petition dismissed as withdrawn. No relief adjudicated on merits. ¶¶17

Pankaj Bajaj Vs Union Territory, Chandigarh and Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

105 CWP-18214-2025 (O & M) Date of Decision:29.05.2026

¶3

PANKAJ BAJAJ

¶4

...PETITIONER

¶5

VERSUS UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI

¶7

Present: Mr. Tarun Jindal, Advocate and Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶8

None for the respondents.

¶9

¶10

SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL)

¶11

CM-8790-CWP-2026

¶12

Prayer in this application is for withdrawal of the present petition, which is otherwise fixed for 15.09.2026.

¶13

On an oral request made by counsel for the petitioner, date of hearing in the main petition is preponed to today and is taken on Board today itself.

¶14

Application is disposed of.

¶15

Main Case

¶16

On the basis of prayer made in the application (CM-8790-CWP2026), which is supported with an affidavit of the petitioner, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the writ petition.

¶17

Dismissed as withdrawn.

¶18

(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE

¶19

(VIKAS SURI)

¶20

29.05.2026			(VIKAS S
sheetal			JUDGE
	Whether Speaking/Reasoned	Yes/No
	Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶21

SHEETAL 2026.05.29 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

Pankaj Bajaj v. Union Territory, Chandigarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Bajaj v. Union Territory, Chandigarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil and Anr. Vs Satin Housing Finance Ltd. and Ors.

Suma Rajan Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sumitra Devi Vs Debts Recovery Tribunal II and Ors.

Gurkirat Singh Dhanoa and Ors. Vs Punjab National Bank and Ors.

Moksh Raj and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Gurdeep Singh and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others