Disposed

Suma Rajan v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC27 May 2026CWP/14612/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought direction to consider the petitioner's request for allotment of approximately 130 square yards of vacant land adjoining her residence at a nominal rate. State counsel stated online applications for allotment of incidental open spaces are accepted and would be considered per policy. Petition disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; disposed on State's statement to consider an online application per policy.

Suma Rajan Vs State of Haryana and Others — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

CWP-14612-2026

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

115

¶5

CWP-14612-2026 Date of Decision:27.05.2026

SUMA RAJAN

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

¶10

...RESPONDENTS

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI

¶12

Present: Mr. Ashish Khatkar, Advocate, Mr. Nikhil Vats, Advocate, Ms. Anju Rani, Advocate and Mr. Amit Kadyan, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

¶14

¶15

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)

¶16

This petition has been filed, inter alia , for directing respondents to consider the representation submitted by petitioner for allotment of vacant land measuring 130 square yards, approximately, adjoining the residential house of petitioner at a nominal rate.

¶17

Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the respondents.

¶18

SHEETAL 2026.05.30 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

¶19

CWP-14612-2026

¶20

-2-

¶21

Mr. Bhardwaj, has placed on record a copy of Memo No.A-7UB-2021/187377 dated 29.10.2021 to submit that an application for allotment of incidental open spaces has to be made by the plot holder online and physical applications cannot be accepted. He has instructions to state that, in case, an application is moved online, it shall be duly considered in accordance with the applicable policy and rules.

¶22

In view of the statement made by State counsel, writ petition is

¶23

disposed of.

¶24

(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE

¶25

27.05.2026 (VIKAS SURI) sheetal JUDGE

¶26

Whether Speaking/Reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶27

SHEETAL 2026.05.30 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

Suma Rajan v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suma Rajan v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yushutosh and Another Vs Authorised Officer Edelweiss Asets Reconstruction Company Ltd. and Others

Au Small Finance Bank Limited Vs the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana

Ajay Jain Vs Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran Hsvp and Another

Sunil and Anr. Vs Satin Housing Finance Ltd. and Ors.

Sumitra Devi Vs Debts Recovery Tribunal II and Ors.

Joginder Kaur and Others Vs Authorized Officer Punjab National Bank and Others