Pawan Kumar Chugh v. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Chd. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Pawan Kumar Chugh v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Chandigarh and others; CWP-14720-2026; High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Kirti Singh J.; Article 226 Constitution of India; Employees' Pension Scheme 1995; joint option for pension on higher wages; EPFO Regional Office Chandigarh rejection order 29.03.2025 Annexure P-4; employer formal approval 20.10.2023; legal notice 11.03.2026 Annexure P-8; direction to respondent No.1 to decide within four months by speaking order; disposed without commenting on merits; Nitish Pathak for petitioner; Salil Sabhlok for respondents No.1 to 3.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the petitioner's legal notice dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P-8) expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law.