Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a writ petition (CWP-8401-2026). The High Court granted the petitioners permission to withdraw the petition and dismissed the matter accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; the petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
171
CWP-8401-2026
Date of Decision: 26.05.2026
YUSHUTOSH AND ANR
...Petitioners
Versus
AUTHORISED OFFICER EDELWEISS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD AND ORS
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI
Present:Mr. Atul Sharma, Advocate (through V.C.), for the petitioners.
Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)
he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
( SUVIR SEHGAL )
JUDGE
( VIKAS SURI ) May 26, 2026 JUDGE harish
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
HARISH KUMAR 2026.05.27 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Yushutosh and Anr
Authorised Officer Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Company Ltd and Ors
Suvir Sehgal
Vikas Suri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
