Petitioner sought mandamus for release of approved 9-year ACP benefits from 16.07.2021 with arrears and interest; his legal notice remained pending. Court disposed of the petition without going into merits, directing respondent No.1 to decide the notice by a speaking order after hearing, within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
119
CWP-13331-2026 Date of decision: 01.05.2026
Dr. Vikas Aggarwal
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present : Mr. Sahil Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner.
NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
VINAY 2026.05.05 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
-2-
CWP-13331-2026
| 01.05.2026 Vinay |
(NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
|
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
VINAY 2026.05.05 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents can be directed to decide the petitioner's pending legal notice regarding release of 9-year ACP benefits with arrears and interest.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Vikas Aggarwal
State of Punjab
Namit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
