Mari Muttu v. H.U.D.A.
Case brief
What is this about?
Short oral disposal judgment. Court: High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh; sole author Justice Aman Chaudhary; decided 10.07.2026; CWP-11890-2007 (O&M); Petitioner MARI MUTTU v. Respondent H.U.D.A.; counsel Jai Bhardwaj and Vikram Singh (petitioner side), Naveen Kumar Addl. AG Haryana. Substance: direction-based disposal compelling HUDA to adjudicate the petitioner's pending claim/legal notice (Annexure P3) in light of two 1996 CWP decisions (Randhir Singh; Ramesh Chand), both relied_on; no statutes cited; no amounts; conditional benefit and reasoned-adverse-order safeguards.
What did the court decide?
Direction to HUDA to decide the petitioner's claim expeditiously in accordance with law, taking note of the judgments in Randhir Singh (CWP-811-1996) and Ramesh Chand (CWP-2544-1996); benefit forthwith if found entitled after notice and hearing; reasoned orders if adverse.