Petitioner sought disposal of a writ petition as infructuous, having retired with previous pay protected. The court ordered the petition disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
454 CWP-15944-2005 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.07.2026
PARVEEN ARORA ... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HRY. & ORS. ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
| (AMAN | CHAUDHARY) | |
|---|---|---|
| 09.07.2026 | JUDGE | |
| ashok | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
|
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.09 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
PARVEEN ARORA
STATE OF HRY.
AMAN CHAUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
