Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel for petitioners pleaded no instructions. Pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[209] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-10 0 89-1996 (O&M) Date of D ecision : 14.07.2026
Darshan S ingh and others …Petitioners Versus State of P unjab and others ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: Mr. Aditya Naranyan, Advo c ate for the petitioners.
Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Pun j ab.
Mr. B.S. Sewak, Advocate fo r respondent Nos.4 to 6.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
disposed o ff .
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
14.07.20 2 6
‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.16 18:48 I agree to specified portions of this document
Darshan Singh and others
State of Punjab
Respondent Nos. 4 to 6
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
