Disposed¶9

Baljinder Singh Alias Ranch v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC11 May 2026CRWP/5330/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Baljinder Singh alias Ranch v. State of Punjab and others; CRWP-5330-2026; decision 11.05.2026; Anoop Chitkara J.; parole / temporary release application rejected 23.04.2026; Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962, Section 3(1)(A) & (D); Articles 226 and 227 certiorari; medical report of ailing mother; withdrawal with liberty; interim suspension of sentence in pending conviction appeal; petition disposed of as withdrawn; miscellaneous applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file an application for interim suspension of sentence in the petitioner's pending appeal against conviction before this Court; all pending miscellaneous applications disposed of. ¶9

Baljinder Singh Alias Ranch Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

103 CRWP-5330-2026 Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 BALJINDER SINGH ALIAS RANCH ......... Pe��oner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Vinayak Bhanot, Advocate and Ms. Anmol Sharma, Advocate for the pe��oner. Mr. Akshay Kumar, A.A.G, Punjab.

¶3

¶4

ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)

¶5

The present pe��on has been filed under Ar�cles 226 and 227 of the Cons�tu�on of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Cer�orari for se/ng aside the impugned order dated 23.04.2026 (Annexure P-2), whereby the applica�on for temporary release/parole under Sec�on 3(1)(A) & (D) of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962, & Amendment Act, 2015 (amended up to date), seeking parole, has been

¶6

rejected

¶7

Counsel for the pe��oner has handed over the medical report of the pe��oner’s ailing mother to the State counsel.

¶8

State counsel seeks �me to verify the medical condi�on of pe��oner’s mother. 4. Counsel for the pe��oner submits that he wants to withdraw the present pe��on with liberty to file an applica�on for interim suspension of sentence in the appeal filed by the pe��oner challenging the convic�on, which is pending before this Court.

¶9

Given above, the present pe��on stands disposed of having been withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. All pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.

¶10

11.05.2026 Jyo�-II

¶11

	(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶12

JYOTI 2026.05.13 09:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

Baljinder Singh Alias Ranch v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baljinder Singh Alias Ranch v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Kumar Alias Sonu Vs State of Haryana and Others

Narveer Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

Gohla Vs State of Punjab

Mahipal Vs Krishan Kumar Verma

Raj Kumar Vs Vijay Singh and Another

Anand Kumar Vs Ut of Chandigarh