Dismissed¶13
Mahipal v. Krishan Kumar Verma
Punjab & Haryana HCCRR(F)/66/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; Anoop Chitkara J.; case CRA-AS-66-2017; Mahipal (appellant) v. Krishan Kumar Verma (respondent); decided 11.05.2026; dismissal for non-prosecution; no representation for appellant; case called twice; pending applications disposed of; not reportable; speaking/reasoned: Yes; no advocates appeared ('Present: None'); no statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
As there was no representation for the appellant despite the case being called twice, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ¶13