Disposed¶20

Amrik Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC10 Mar 2026CRWP/2399/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.3-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Fatehgarh Sahib, to consider the representation dated 08.01.2026 (Annexure P-2) and to take steps in accordance with law. ¶20

Amrik Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶2

136

¶3

CRWP-2399-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 10.03.2026

¶4

Amrik Singh … Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Punjab and others

¶7

... Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA

¶9

Present:Mr. G.S. Ghuman, Advocate with Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate and Mr. P.S. Maan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶10

¶11

SUBHAS MEHLA, J . (Oral)

¶12

Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India in the nature of mandamus seeking direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner which is in danger at the hands of respondents No.4 to 19.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a civil dispute exists between the petitioner and respondent No. 7, as a forged and fabricated Will is under challenge before the Civil Court, which has already issued notices in the matter. However, respondent No. 7, being an influential person, allegedly attempted to take possession of the land in question with the assistance of the local police. It is further submitted that the petitioner and his female family members were detained at the police station. In this regard, a

¶14

GEETA RANI 2026.03.12 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

¶15

CRWP-2399-2026 (O&M) ( 2 )

¶16

representation dated 08.01.2026 (Annexure P-2) was submitted, but no action has been taken so far.

¶17

Notice of motion.

¶18

Mr. Adesh Pal Singh, AAG, Punjab, accepted notice on behalf of respondent-State and submitted that the representation has been received; both the parties were called, and enquiry has been initiated by SPD, Fatehgarh Sahib.

¶19

Heard.

¶20

Keeping in view the contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Fatehgarh Sahib, to consider the representation dated 08.01.2026 (Annexure P-2) and to take steps in accordance with law.

¶21

( SUBHAS MEHLA ) 10.03.2026 JUDGE

¶22

Geeta Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No

¶23

GEETA RANI 2026.03.12 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

Amrik Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrik Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ishwar Singh Sangwan Vs State of Haryana and Others

Mehak Vs Union Terrotory Chandigarh and Others

Ranjit Singh Vs State of Punjab

Ravneet Kaur Advocate Vs Ut Chandigarh and Others

Suresh Jindal Vs State of Haryana and Others

Isha Alias Nisha Alias Nishu Vs State of Haryana