Disposed¶19

Amit Nain v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC18 May 2026CRM-M/6826/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRM-M-6826-2026 (O&M); Amit Nain v. State of Haryana; Punjab and Haryana High Court; anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS 2023; FIR No. 420 dated 27.08.2025, PS Sadar Bhiwani; Sections 109, 3(5), 61(2), 238(2) BNS; Section 25 Arms Act; interim bail order 02.04.2026 made absolute; petitioner joined investigation; custodial interrogation not required; petition disposed 18.05.2026; Mandeep Pannu, J.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail secured: interim bail order dated 02.04.2026 made absolute; petition and pending miscellaneous application(s) disposed of. ¶19

Amit Nain Vs State of Haryana — Anticipatory Bail | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CRM-M-6826-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 18.05.2026

AMIT NAIN

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA

.....RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

¶9

Present: Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Palkin Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., H aryana.

¶11

MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL)

¶12

The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has bee n filed for grant o f anticipatory bail to the pe t itioner in FIR No. 420, date d 27.08.2025, und e r Sections 109, 3(5), 61(2), 23 8 (2), BNS and Section 25 of th e Arms Act, regist e red at Police Station Sadar, Bh i wani (Annexure P-1). 2. Sho r t reply by way of an affidavit o f Mahesh Kumar HPS, Deput y Superintendent o f Police, HQ Bhiwani, Distri c t Bhiwani, has been filed, o n behalf of respon d ent-State, which is taken on record.

¶13

The Co-ordinate Bench of this Co u rt vide order dated 02.04.2026 , granted the concession of interim bail to the pet i tioner, subject to his joining th e investigation.

¶14

Lea r ned counsel for the petitioner s ubmits that in pursuance to th e order dated 02.0 4 .2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶15

Lea r ned State counsel on instru c tions from SI Baljeet Singh , submits that he does not controvert the said fact and further submits tha t HIMANSHUcustodial interro g ation of the petitioner is not re q uired. 2026.05.18 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

-2-

¶17

CRM-M-6826-2026 (O&M)

¶18