Allowed

Vijay Kumar Dhanuka v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC16 Jan 2026CRM-M/39082/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, incarcerated in an IPC FIR, sought regular bail under BNSS Sec. 483. Having complied with prior interim conditions, the petitioner argued for absolute bail. The High Court, noting no objection from the complainant, made the interim order absolute.

What did the court decide?

Interim order dated 17.09.2025 is made absolute. All pending applications stand disposed of.

Vijay Kumar Dhanuka Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

CRM-M-39082-2025

¶2

201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRM-M-39082-2025 Date of Decision: 16.01.2026

Vijay Kumar Dhanuka

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana …Respondent

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

¶9

Present: Mr. Jasdev Singh Mehndiratta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shivendra Dwivedi, Advocate Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Advocate Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate Mr. Kanwarnoor Singh Sethi, Advocate and Ms. Tanveen Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Shiva Khurmi, D.A.G., Haryana.

¶11

Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Rahul Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Suhaan Mukerji, Advocate Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate Mr. Adarsh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Tanmay Sinha, Advocate Mr. R.S. Bagga, Advocate and Mr. Aditya Narayan Arya Garg, Advocate for the complainant. ****

¶12

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

¶13

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station		Sections
121	25.03.2023	DLF, Sector	29,	409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B,
		Gurugram		201 IPC

¶14

The petitioner, incarcerated in the FIR captioned above, had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.

¶15

Vide order dated 17.09.2025, this Court had granted interim regular bail to the petitioner subject to his joining investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigator and concerned Superintendent of Police was directed to conduct further investigation in the FIR captioned above for recovery of proceeds of crime.

¶16

Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has complied with the condition as envisaged by this Court and has cooperated with the Investigating Agency.

¶17

JYOTI SHARMA 2026.01.27 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

¶18

¶19

CRM-M-39082-2025

¶20

Counsel for the complainant as well as State does not dispute the aforesaid fact and counsel for the complainant submits that he has no objection if the interim bail granted to the petitioner is made absolute.

¶21

Given above, the present petition is allowed. Interim order dated 17.09.2025 is made absolute. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶22

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE

¶23

16.01.2026 Jyoti Sharma

¶24

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.

¶25

JYOTI SHARMA 2026.01.27 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

¶26

Vijay Kumar Dhanuka v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar Dhanuka v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxman Dass Vs Subash Chand and Ors.

Sarwan Kumar Alias Sharvan Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sandeep Alias Cartoon Alias Kartoon Vs State of Haryana and Others

Virender Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

Naresh Kumar Gupta and Anr. Vs M/S Sood Resigns and Polymers

Naresh Kumar Gupta and Another Vs M/S Sood Resigns and Polymers