The court dismissed the petition as it had become infructuous because the police had presented the final report of investigation. Pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
222
CRM-M-22441 of 2025(O&M) Date of Order:01.07.2026
Narinder Kumar
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present: Mr. Dinesh Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab.
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J. (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petition has
become infructuous as the police has presented final report of investigation.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE
01.07.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
REEMA SAINI 2026.07.01 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Narinder Kumar
State of Punjab and others
Shalini Singh Nagpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
