Gagndeep Singh @ Gaggo Vs State of Punjab

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0115 dated 22.07.2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(3), 333 BNS/323, 324, 149, 148, 452 IPC at Police Station Rajasansi, District Amritsar .

¶17

Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for about 5 months. The allegations against him are of having caused simple injuries to the complainant. He has been falsely implicated in the case only on account of being a good friend of co-accused Vinay, who was having a dispute with the complainant. Co-accused Ajay Singh has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2025, Annexure P-3. Challan was presented on 22.01.2026, however, charges have not been framed and in all there are 18 prosecution witnesses. The petitioner is not involved in any other case .

¶18

The custody certificate dated 09.04.2026, filed by the learned State counsel is taken on record. As per the same, the petitioner is behind bars for 4

¶19

MOHIT 2026.04.10 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

� CRM-M-18395-2026 (O&M) 2

¶21

months and 22 days.

¶22

4 . Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations against the petitioner of having actively participated in the commission of offence, being a part of unlawful assembly. However, he is unable to controvert the submissions with regard to stage, co-accused having been granted bail and the petitioner being not involved in any other case.

¶23

Heard.

¶24

6 . �� !!��"��#��#�� "��$��"��!!�%&�!%!'� ��(�#��&)�� (������ (��#��#��!&�� +��(��

¶25

The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following conditions:-

¶26

(i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶27

(ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses.

¶28

(iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a specific order of Court.

¶29

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which, he is an accused, or for commission of which he is suspected of.

¶30

(v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly coerce, induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted

¶31

MOHIT 2026.04.10 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶32

� CRM-M-18395-2026 (O&M) 3

¶33

with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner.

¶34

(vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty.

¶35

(vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid, it shall be done only with prior information to the learned trial Court.

¶36

(viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court.

¶37

(ix) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the petitioner.

¶38

It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order.

¶39

In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations.

¶40

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 10.04.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No

¶41

MOHIT 2026.04.10 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Gagndeep Singh @ Gaggo v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gagndeep Singh @ Gaggo v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Virender Singh Vs State of Punjab

Gursev Singh Vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Another

Rishiba @ Rishiba Sharma Vs State of Punjab and Another

Veena Vs State of Punjab

Raj Kumar @ Kalia Vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Another

Amandeep Singh Vs State of Haryana and Another