Virender Singh Vs State of Punjab

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0003, dated 30.01.2026, under Sections 7-A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 420, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, FS, Phase-1, District SAS Nagar (Mohali).

¶13

On 25.03.2026, this Court had passed the following order:-

¶14

“Learned Senior counsel inter alia contends that there is neither any demand nor acceptance by the petitioner and he was unconnected to co-accused TK Goyal to whom allegedly amount of bribe was paid at a hotel. There is no evidence to show that the petitioner was present at the spot. There is nothing to substantiate that the demand was made through him. He is not involved in any other case; ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion.

¶15

At the asking of the Court, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 02.04.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated.

¶16

Adjourned to 09.04.2026.”

¶17

ASHOK KUMAR 2026.04.09 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

CRM-M-11366-2026 (O&M)

¶19

-2-

¶20

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore-mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

¶21

Learned State counsel on instructions from the Investigating Officer affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation.

¶22

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 25.03.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

¶23

6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

¶24

	(AMAN	CHAUDHARY)
09.04.2026		JUDGE
ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned	: Yes/No
Whether reportable	: Yes/No

¶25

ASHOK KUMAR 2026.04.09 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Virender Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virender Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sulender Sharma Vs State of Haryana and Others

Pardeep Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sanjeev Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Gursev Singh Vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Another

Rishiba @ Rishiba Sharma Vs State of Punjab and Another

Paramjit Singh and Other Vs State of Punjab and Others