Petitioner sought withdrawal of his petition after he had been acquitted, rendering it infructuous; the court dismissed the petition as infructuous and disposed of pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(272) CRM-M-18362-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:-08.07.2026
RAJESH KUMAR @ RAJESH KASHYAP … Petitioner Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. Pawan Attri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana.
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J . (Oral)
to withdraw the instant petition at this stage as the petitioner has been acquitted and the present petition has been rendered as infructuous.
been rendered as infructuous.
posed of.
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL)
08th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam
Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No
POONAM 2026.07.10 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kashyap
State of Haryana
Virinder Aggarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
