Disposed¶22

Lovish v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC23 Feb 2026CRM-M/15370/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, Vinod S. Bhardwaj J., 23.02.2026, CRM-M-15370-2025(O&M): regular bail under S.483 BNSS 2023 in FIR 610/2024 (Ss.308(4), 351(2), 111(3), 61 BNS 2023; S.111(5) BNS and Ss.25(6) & 29 Arms Act 1959 added later), PS Indri, Karnal. Petition not pressed; disposed of with direction to prosecution to conclude evidence within 06 months from date next fixed before Trial Court; pending applications disposed of. Keywords: bail not pressed, expedition of trial, six-month prosecution evidence timeline.

What did the court decide?

Bail petition disposed of as not pressed at this stage; prosecution directed to conclude its evidence within six months from the date next fixed before the Trial Court; pending applications disposed of. ¶22

Lovish Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

136

¶3

CRM-M-15370-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 23.02.2026

Lovish

...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

State of Haryana ...Respondent(s)

¶8

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

¶9

Present :- Mr. Aman Pal, Senior Advocate assisted by

¶10

Mr. Rishabh Chaudhary, Ms. Neha Rani and

¶11

Mr. Sankalp Dhanda, Advocates for the petitioners.

¶12

Mr. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

¶13

¶14

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

¶15

The present first petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.610 dated 02.10.2024 registered under Sections 308(4), 351(2), 111(3), 61 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [Section 111(5) of BNS and Sections 25(6) & 29 of the Arms Act, 1959 added later on] at Police Station Indri, District Karnal.

¶16

After arguing the matter at some length, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not press the instant petition and contends that taking into consideration the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner, the Trial Court may be directed to expedite the conclusion of the trial.

¶17

Learned State Counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. He however contends that the prosecution shall take all efforts to expeditiously conclude the prosecution evidence at best within a period of 06 months from

¶18

SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.24 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

¶20

136 CRM-M-15370-2025(O&M)

¶21

the date next fixed before the Trial Court for recording of the prosecution evidence.

¶22

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed at this stage.

¶23

The prosecution is however directed to conclude its evidence within a period of 06 months from the date next fixed before the Trial Court. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶24

23.02.2026

¶25

(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE

¶26

Sumit Gusain

¶27

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶28

SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.24 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Lovish v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lovish v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.K. Jain Vs State of Haryana

Mukul Dhall and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Another

Rahul @ Rathore Vs State of Haryana

Vijay Vs State of Haryana

Mandeep Singh @ Rock Vs State of Punjab

Balwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab