Case brief
What is this about?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; CRM-M-12571-2026; decided 10.07.2026 by VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (oral); petition under S. 528 BNSS 2023 to quash FIR No. 407 dt. 30.09.2017 (Ss. 147, 148, 323, 427, 506 IPC, P.S. Bilaspur, Gurugram) based on compromise dt. 25.02.2026 DISMISSED; JMFC Pataudi report 22.04.2026; complainant Raj Kumar supported compromise but injured/aggrieved persons Parveen, Ravinder, Tarawati and Mahender neither appeared nor are parties; consent of all injured/aggrieved persons required for compromise-based quashing via inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 BNSS 2023.
What did the court decide?
In the absence of the consent of all the injured/aggrieved persons, the compromise cannot be treated as complete or voluntary so as to warrant the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.