Petitioner withdrew the petition at the stage of leave with a liberty to file it afresh. The High Court permitted the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
217 CRM-M-12076-2026
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-12076-2026 Date of decision: 26.05.2026
HARPREET SINGH ALIAS HAPPY ….Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present:Mr. H.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG Punjab.
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition at this stage with liberty to file the same afresh, if so required in future, in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with aforesaid liberty.
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 26.05.2026 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No
PUNEET SHARMA 2026.05.27 19.09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Harpreet Singh Alias Happy
State of Punjab
Rupinderjit Chahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
