monthly interest of 5% and in lieu of that, the complainant obtained her signatures on blank stamp paper of Rs.500/-, which was subsequently converted into an agreement to sell. He further argued that the petitioner has already returned the money to the complainant and now he is demanding Rs.1,40,000/- from the petitioner and in order to pressurize her, the false FIR has been registered against the petitioner. He further argued that if the contents of the FIR are taken to be true, even then the dispute in the present case is of civil nature, which has been given criminal colour by registering the present FIR. He further submitted that the entire case is based on documentary evidence which are already in possession of the complainant or the investigating agency, hence, nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner. No recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating agency.
