The court dismissed the present appeal, holding that no merit existed in the arguments regarding the means of assault and injury attribution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JYOTI 2026.03.18 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRA-D-168-2020 (O&M) -2-
prove that they entered in the room of the victim, as all the articles of room i.e. table, chair were at their place.
4 Counsel for the complainant submits that an iron rod was used which could
itself make a case under Section 307 IPC. In case, even if an iron rod was used it has to be established that any injury which could have been fatal was caused by such rod. The attribution is by the gun shot not by the rod. Moreover, there is no criminal record to support this version.
5 Given above, there is no merit in the present appeal. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
6 It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for this appeal and it shall have no bearing in the appeal if any, filed by the convicts against their conviction.
| (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|
| (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE |
||
| 16.03.2026 | ||
| jyoti3 | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? |
: Yes/ No : Yes/ No |
JYOTI 2026.03.18 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Anoop Chitkara
Sukhvinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
