Disposed
Raj Karan and Others v. State of Haryana and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/614/2025
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 139+141 Raj…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 139+141 Raj…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Civil Revision No.614 of 2025 (O & M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
139+141
CM No.23814-CII-2025 in/and Civil Revision No.614 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-13.01.2026
Raj Karan and others
…..Applicants-Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
…..Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:Mr. Namit Khurana, Advoc a te for the applicants-petitioner s .
Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A .G., Haryana.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
CM-23814-CII-2015
Prayer in this application is f or placing on record copy of the dema r cation/measurement report dat e d 30.12.2023 of Abadi Deh land of s a me vicinity by learned A.C.IIn d Grade as Annexure P- 13. The application is allowed s ubject to all just exceptions and the a f oresaid document is taken on r e cord as Annexure P-13. CR-614-2025
Prayer in the present revisio n petition is for setting aside the impu g ned Order dated 18.11.2024 ( a nnexure P-9) passed by the learned C ivil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Yamuna Nagar in Civil Suit No.CS945-2018 titled as “Raj Karan vs. State of Haryana etc.” whereby it has been h eld by the learned trial Court t h at the demarcation could not
VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 19.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Civil Revision No.614 of 2025 (O & M) 2
be conducted; and impugned order date d 08.1.2025 (annexure P-12) whereby the application for review of the order dated 18.11.2024 stands di s missed.
At the very outset, learne d counsel for the petitioner submits that the present revision p e tition has been rendered infructuo u s as the main suit has been d ecided by the learned trial Court, th e refore this revision petition m a y be disposed of as having been ren d ered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application(s), if an y , shall stand(s) disposed of.
January 13, 2026 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 19.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Raj Karan and others
State of Haryana and others
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court