Parveen Kumar @ Pawan Kumar v. Ashok Kumar and Another
Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh (Nidhi Gupta, J., oral) – Civil Revision 229 CR-1401-2017, decided 06.05.2026
Case brief
What is this about?
Rent-restriction civil revision (CR-1401-2017), High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, Nidhi Gupta J. (oral), decided 06.05.2026. Petitioner Parveen Kumar @ Pawan challenged concurrent findings of both the Authorities below accepting respondent No.1-landlord Ashok Kumar's petition under Section 13, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. Disposed of as infructuous on the undisputed joint position that possession of the demised property is with respondent No.1-landlord; pending applications disposed of; no merits adjudicated; no cases cited; advocates: Akash Manocha (petitioner), Rosy and Ashish Bakshi (respondent No. 1).
What did the court decide?
None; the revision petition was disposed of as having been rendered infructuous (possession of the demised property being with respondent No.1-landlord), and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.