Contempt petition alleging violation of an interim order restraining construction. Court inspection found no additional construction beyond a pre-existing tent Gurudwara; no violation established, petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
210/2
COCP-2365-2018 Date of decision: July 14, 2026
PRATEEK L A LL AND ANOTHER
...Petitioner s
Versus
STATE OF H ARYANA AND OTHERS
...Respondent s
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocat e with Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Additional A d vocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Rajesh K. Kataria, Advocat e , Ms. Parul Chaudhary, Advocate and Ms. Prabhjot Kaur, Advocate for respondent no.9.
Mr. P.S. Hundal, Senior Advoca t e with Mr. G.S. Hundal, Advocate for respondents no.10 and 11.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL)
The petition has been filed alleging violation of the interi m order date d 10.11.2017, Annexure P-1, passed by this Court i n
CWP-25283 - 2017, which reads as under:
Service is complete. Counsel for the respond e nts pray for time to file thei r reply(ies).
On their request, adjourn e d to 20.11.2017. Till then, the private r e spondents are restrained fro m raising construction.
JASPREET KAUR and no cons t ruction on the site was raised. Specific affidavit to that effec t 2026.07.17 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
COCP-2365-2018
-2-
has been filed by the then Deputy Commissioner/respondent no.6, which is to the following effect:
| July 14, 2026 | (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) |
|---|---|
| Jaspreet Kaur | JUDGE |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
JASPREET KAUR 2026.07.17 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Was the interim order dated 10.11.2017 restraining construction violated by the respondents?
Prateek Lal and another
State of Haryana and others
Tribhuvan Dahiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
