Disposed¶20

Jaskaran Singh v. Dr. Jyoti Yadav Bains

Punjab & Haryana HC24 Mar 2026COCP/1300/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt of court; COCP-1300-2026 (O&M); disobedience of order dated 20.11.2025 in CRM-M-65527-2025; compliance found; representation considered and rejected by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bathinda; communication dated 29.01.2026 taken on record; contempt purged; rule discharged; liberty to challenge rejection communication; Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh; Sudeepti Sharma J.; decision 24.03.2026; Jaskaran Singh v. Dr. Jyoti Yadav Bains; DAG Punjab Ravneet S. Joshi.

What did the court decide?

Contempt purged and rule discharged upon finding of compliance with the order dated 20.11.2025; petitioner left free to pursue lawful remedies against the communication dated 29.01.2026; pending applications disposed of. ¶20

Jaskaran Singh Vs Dr. Jyoti Yadav Bains — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

COCP-1300-2026 (O&M) -1-

¶2

114

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

COCP-1300-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.03.2026

¶5

Jaskaran Singh ......Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

Dr. Jyoti Yadav Bains ......Respondent

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

¶9

Present : Mr. Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate, Mr. Raj Kumar Poonia, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Ravneet S. Joshi, DAG, Punjab, for the respondent.

¶11

¶12

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL)

¶13

The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 20.11.2025 passed by this Court in CRM-M-65527-2025, whereby respondent was directed to consider and decide the representation/complaint of the petitioner.

¶14

Notice of motion.

¶15

On asking of the Court, Mr. Ravneet S. Joshi, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and submits that in compliance of order dated 20.11.2025 passed by this Court in CRM-M-65527-2025, representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejected by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bathinda. He has produced a copy of

¶16

VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.03.25 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

COCP-1300-2026 (O&M)

¶18

-2-

¶19

communication dated 29.01.2026 issued by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bathinda, in Court. The same is taken on record. A copy thereof has been given to learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶20

In view of the above, since order dated 20.11.2025 passed by this Court in CRM-M-65527-2025, has been complied with, therefore, the present contempt is purged and rule stands discharged.

¶21

Needless to say that the petitioner is at liberty to avail remedy as is available to him in accordance with law to challenge the said communication dated 29.01.2026.

¶22

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶23

(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE

¶24

24.03.2026 Virender

¶25

Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶26

VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.03.25 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Jaskaran Singh v. Dr. Jyoti Yadav Bains

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaskaran Singh v. Dr. Jyoti Yadav Bains

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Monika Chetal and Others Vs Kumar Rahul and Another

Mandeep Singh and Others Vs Anindita Mitra IAS and Others

Dara Singh Vs Vikram Yadav and Another

State of Haryana and Ors. Vs Dharambir Singh

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Shivani Thakur and Ors.

Chander and Others Vs Sudhir Rajpal , IAS and Others