Tamanna Aggarwal Vs Himanshu Bindal

The applicant-wife has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. HMA/74/2024, titled ‘Himanshu Bindal Vs. Tamanna Aggarwal’, filed by the respondent-husband, pending in the Family Court, Kurukshetra and she seeks transfer of the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Derabassi, District SAS Nagar.

¶17

Upon notice issued, the respondent made appearance through counsel and filed reply.

¶18

Counsel for the parties heard.

¶19

It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage

¶20

between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 06.12.2021, but no child

¶21

Sonu 2025.12.16 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶22

2

¶23

TA-1501-2024

¶24

was born from the said wedlock. On account of the matrimonial dispute, the parties are residing separate. The applicant is not having any source of earning and as such, is dependent upon her parental family. The distance between the two places is stated to be about 85 kms. Also, it is submitted that earlier, the petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, was filed by the applicant. However, on the basis of the compromise, the same was withdrawn and thereafter, again, the dispute arose between the parties.

¶25

On the other hand, counsel for the respondent submits that it shall be too harsh for the respondent also, to pursue the divorce petition, if so transferred. Also, it is submitted that the distance is not such, which causes inconvenience to the applicant.

¶26

In view of the submissions aforesaid, it is pertinent to mention that while dealing with the transfer application relating to the matrimonial dispute, various circumstances are required to be taken into consideration, such like, children, if any, born from the wedlock of the parties, which parent is having the custody of the children, the financial resources of both the spouses, the convenience of the witnesses and so on and so forth. In the case in hand, the most relevant and weighing factor is about the applicant not having any source of earning and also the distance between the two places to be about 85 kms.

¶27

In view of the aforesaid fact situation, it is just and expedient to accept the application. Hence, the transfer application is allowed and the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. HMA/74/2024, Sonu titled ‘Himanshu Bindal Vs. Tamanna Aggarwal’, filed by the respondent2025.12.16 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶28

3

¶29

TA-1501-2024

¶30

husband, stands transferred from the Family Court, Kurukshetra, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Derabassi, District SAS Nagar. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court, Kurukshetra, to the District and Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar.

¶31

Learned District and Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar, shall assign the said petition to the Family Court (Camp Court) Derabassi. Even, the parties are directed to appear before the Family Court (Camp Court) Derabassi, within a period of one month from today onwards.

¶32

(ARCHANA PURI) 15.12.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Vats Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶33

Sonu 2025.12.16 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Tamanna Aggarwal v. Himanshu Bindal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamanna Aggarwal v. Himanshu Bindal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jinder Kaur and Ors. Vs Som Nath and Anr.

Dr. Rajbir Singh Gulia Vs Maha Prabhu Ram Mulkh Hi-Tech Education Society and Ors.

Navjot Kaur Vs Gurvinderjit Kaur

Nisha Rani Vs Rajesh Kumar Bhatt

Santosh and Ors. Vs Om Parkash Yadav and Ors.

Gaurav Raheja Vs Neha