Dismissed¶14

Bhupinder Singh v. Purandeep Singh

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Sept 2025RSA/4140/1999

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court order dated 03.09.2025 by Amarinder Singh Grewal, J. dismissing four connected 1999-vintage RSAs (RSA-4140/4141/4142/4756-1999 O&M) for non-prosecution; appellants deceased, LR notices returned unserved, no contact despite repeated efforts; liberty reserved to LRs to seek revival in accordance with law if cogent cause survives; pending applications disposed; no statutes or precedents cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution; liberty reserved to the LRs of the appellants to seek revival of the appeal in accordance with law if any cogent cause of action survives; pending application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶14

Bhupinder Singh Vs Purandeep Singh — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

(205) Date of Decision:-03.09.2025 1.RSA-4140-1999(O&M) S. Bhupinder Singh and Others ……Appellant Vs Punardeep Singh ……Respondent 2.RSA-4141-1999(O&M) S. Bhupinder Singh and Others ……Appellant Vs Punardeep Singh ……Respondent 3.RSA-4142-1999(O&M) Punardeep Singh ……Appellant Vs Bhupinder Singh and Others ……Respondent 4.RSA-4756-1999(O&M) Punardeep Singh ……Appellant Vs Bhupinder Singh and Others ……Respondent

¶3

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

¶4

¶5

Present: None for the appellant.

¶6

Mr. Ravinder Singh Rawal, AAG, Punjab.

¶7

¶8

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)

¶9

As per para No.5 of the status report filed by the learned AAG, Punjab, the details of the legal representatives (LRs) of the deceased appellants have been provided. Pursuant thereto, notices were issued to the said LRs, which, however, have been received back unserved.

¶10

A perusal of the case file reveals that the present appeal pertains to the year 1999. Despite repeated and best efforts, neither the

¶11

SHUBHAM 2025.09.10 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order

¶12

appellants nor their legal representatives could be served or contacted.

¶13

In these circumstances, and considering the inordinate delay

¶14

and non-appearance, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution , with liberty reserved to the LRs of the appellants to seek revival of the appeal in accordance with law, in case any cogent cause of action survives

¶15