Dismissed¶2

Prem Chand v. Jogindro Devi

Punjab & Haryana HC2 Sept 2025RSA/1485/1998

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana HC, RSA-1485-1998(O&M), Prem Chand v. Jogindro Devi, decided 02.09.2025 (Amarinder Singh Grewal, J., oral): second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; notice to sole appellant returned unserved (no such village in tehsil Balachaur); appellant absent despite opportunities; liberty to revive on cogent cause of action; pending applications disposed. Keywords: non-prosecution, dismissal for default, unserved notice, revival liberty, RSA.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the appellant for revival of the appeal if any cogent cause of action survives. ¶2

Prem Chand Vs Jogindro Devi — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

(202)

¶3

RSA-1485-1998(O&M) Date of Decision:-02.09.2025

Prem Chand

……Appellant

Versus

Smt. Jogindro Devi ……Respondent

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

¶9

¶10

Present: None for the appellant.

¶11

Mr.Sushil Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.

¶12

¶13

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)

¶14

As per the office report, notice issued to the sole appellant received back unserved with the report that there is no village of said name in tehsil Balachaur. Despite opportunities, no steps have been taken by the appellant to pursue the present petition and even today, no one has put in appearance on behalf of sole appellant.

¶15

In view of the aforesaid report and lack of due diligence on the part of the appellant, the present appeal stands dismissed for nonprosecution with liberty to its revival, in case, any cogent cause of action survives.

¶16