An LPA concerning treatment of the suspension period after dismissal was modified by a higher forum. A competent authority order dated 04.12.2024 declared the suspension period not spent on duty; the appellant was advised to challenge it in appropriate proceedings and the appeal, having lost efficacy, was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
209 LPA No.1170 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.08.2025
NAVED KHAN No.1187/FBD …. Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS … . Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR
Present : M r . Suresh Kumar Redhu, Advoc a te for the appellant.
M r . Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. D.A.G., H aryana.
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (oral)
Jyoti 2025.08.28 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
LPA No.1170 of 2025 (O&M) - 2-
4. In view of such subsequent devel o pments, this Appeal has lost it s
efficacy and is consequently dismissed . The fil e be consigned to record.
5. P e nding application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE
(ROHIT KAPOOR) AUGUST 22, 2025 JUDGE
Jyoti-IV
Whether speaking/reasoned: Ye s /No. Whether reportable : Ye s /No
Jyoti 2025.08.28 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
How should the period of suspension be treated once the dismissal order has been set aside or modified by a higher forum?
Naved Khan
State of Haryana
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rohit Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
