Amit v. Sunil Kumar and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Non-pursuance disposal: single-judge oral order by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl (Punjab and Haryana HC, Chandigarh) disposing of FAO-400-2024 (Amit v. Sunil Kumar and others) on 21.11.2025 because no counsel represented the appellant ('Present: None for the appellant'; Mr. Lalit Garg appeared for respondent No.3 only); liberty reserved to revive the appeal on request or if any cause survives; copy of order ordered sent to appellant via Registry. No statutory provisions cited, no precedents cited, no quantum involved. Useful as an example of disposal for non-appearance/non-pursuance with revival liberty, not as a source of holdings.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of with liberty to the appellant to revive the same in case he wants to pursue the present case or in case any cause survives; Registry directed to send a copy of the order to the appellant at the address given in the memo of parties.