Balbir Kaur v. Ranjit Kaur & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Short disposal order: counsel for respondent No.3 pointed out that the appeal, which concerned the election to the post of Sarpanch held on 29.06.2003, had become infructuous by efflux of time; the court dismissed the appeal on that basis. No statutes or precedent cases cited and no monetary quantum involved. Court name, case number, bench composition and decision date are not stated in the supplied text; the only timestamp (2025.08.22) is a copy attestation by Pooja Sharma.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. ¶4