Khurshid Ahmed v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Non-reportable, short-order disposal of a civil writ petition as not pressed. Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Case: CWP-9945-2024; Decided: August 19, 2025; Bench: Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (ORAL) and Vikas Suri J. Petitioner: Khurshid Ahmed (counsel: Ishnoor Singh, Randeep Singh, for Vikram Singh). Respondents: State of Haryana and others (counsel: Aman Mittal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana); respondent No.5 (counsel: Mohd. Arshad; identity of respondent No.5 not stated in text). Substance: petitioner withdrew interest in prosecution citing subsequent facts; court 'Ordered accordingly'. No merits decided, no impugned order described, no statutes or cases cited, no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of as not pressed at the petitioner's instance; no substantive relief adjudicated.