Writ petition seeking release of full and final retiral benefits with interest was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared despite the case being called twice and on the last date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
219
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-9507-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.11.2025
Mukhtiar Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Sonak, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Vineet Sachdeva, Advocate for respondent No.4.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)
| (HARP |
REET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.11.2025 | |||
| yakub | Whether speaking/rea | soned: | Yes/No |
| Whether reportable: | Yes/No |
MOHD YAKUB 2025.11.13 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukhtiar Singh
State of Punjab
Respondent No.4
Harpreet Singh Brar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
