Dismissed¶16

Niranjan Lal v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC12 Nov 2025CWP/6328/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; promotion claim to Junior Engineer (Mechanical) left unadjudicated; Articles 226/227 Constitution of India; Punjab & Haryana High Court; single judge Harpreet Singh Brar; petitioner and counsel absent on multiple dates; no relief, no costs or quantum mentioned.

What did the court decide?

It appears that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition, there having been no representation when the case was called twice and on the last two dates of hearing. ¶15

Niranjan Lal Vs State of Haryana and Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

225

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CWP-6328-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.11.2025

Niranjan Lal

....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

¶8

....Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

¶10

Present: None for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, AAG, Haryana.

¶12

None for respondent No.3.

¶13

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)

¶14

Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Junior Engineer (Mechanical), being fully eligible at par with two other employees along with all the consequential benefits.

¶15

The case has been called twice since morning and despite that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The situation was not different even on the last two dates of hearing. It appears that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition.

¶16

In view of the above, having left with no other option, present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶17

		(HARP	REET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE
12.11.2025
yakub	Whether speaking/rea	soned:	Yes/No
	Whether reportable:		Yes/No

¶18

MOHD YAKUB 2025.11.13 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Niranjan Lal v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Niranjan Lal v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Hakam Singh Vs Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Sarjan Vs Managing Director and Others

Pritam Singh Saini Vs Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation

Mukhtiar Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Suresh Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Sunil Dutt and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others