Dismissed¶15

Virender Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Sept 2025CWP/9434/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, CWP-9434-2002 (O&M), decided 04.09.2025 (Jagmohan Bansal, J.). Petition challenging 22.05.2002 repatriation from State Vigilance Bureau to District Cadre dismissed as infructuous following petitioner's 2016 superannuation; liberty to file fresh application within three months if cause survives; pending applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; petitioner left at liberty to move an appropriate application within three months from 04.09.2025 if cause survives ¶15

Virender Singh Vs State of Haryana & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

326 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

¶3

CWP-9434-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.09.2025

¶4

Virender Singh ...Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents

¶7

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

¶8

Present:None for the petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana.

¶10

¶11

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

¶12

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 22.05.2002 whereby he was repatriated from State Vigilance Bureau to District Cadre.

¶13