Malkiat Kaur v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Sept 2025CWP/6046/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Malkiat Kaur v. State of Punjab; CWP-6046-2002; Punjab & Haryana High Court; Jagmohan Bansal J; Article 226/227 Constitution; writ petition disposed as infructuous; Upper School Course deputation; promotion as SI 26.12.2006; retirement 31.08.2009; liberty to file fresh application within three months if cause survives; pending applications disposed; no cases cited; decided 03.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to petitioner to move appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives. ¶¶16

Malkiat Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

CWP-6046-2002 -1-

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

¶4

318 CWP-6046-2002 Date of Decision: 03.09.2025

¶5

MALKIAT KAUR ...Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS …Respondents

¶8

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

¶9

Present:None for the petitioner

¶10

Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab

¶11

¶12

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

¶13

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to depute her for Upper School Course.

¶14

The writ petition was filed in 2002. Notice of motion was issued on 12.04.2002, however, no interim relief was granted.

¶15

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner was deputed for Upper School Course in 2003. She was promoted as SI on 26.12.2006. She has retired on 31.08.2009. Thus, the petition has rendered infructuous.

¶16

In the wake of statement of Learned State counsel, the instant petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to petitioner to move appropriate application within three

¶17

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.04 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

-2-

¶19

CWP-6046-2002

¶20

months from today, if cause survives.

¶21