Jitender Nath Sharma and Others v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
CWP-9050-2022, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, decided 25.04.2025, single bench Kuldeep Tiwari J. Subject: writ petition seeking directions to construct underpass at Crossing No.126 per master plan (Annexure P-6) instead of amended plan (Annexure P-7) with reduced length/breadth; construction completed and underpass operational during pendency; writ dismissed as infructuous; liberty reserved to approach appropriate authority/forum. Keywords: underpass construction, master plan vs amended plan, Crossing No.126, State of Haryana, mandamus directions, completed construction, dismissal of writ petition. No statutes or precedent cases cited.
What did the court decide?
Since the construction of the underpass is already complete and it has been put to operation, the asked-for directions cannot be passed; the writ petition is dismissed, with liberty reserved to the petitioners to approach the appropriate authority/forum for redressal of any grievance with the constructed underpass.