Dismissed¶¶22

Satnam Singh v. Union of India and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Apr 2025CWP/8371/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Satnam Singh v. Union of India and another; CWP-8371-2025 (O&M); High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Harsh Bunger, J.; decided 25.04.2025; passport issuance; writ of Mandamus; Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India; Section 12 of the Passports Act, 1967; Assistant Passport Officer Amritsar; notice dated 08.04.2025; withdrawal of writ petition with liberty; Passport Authorities to take final decision in accordance with law; pending applications closed; dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition permitted to be withdrawn at the petitioner's instance with liberty to respond to the notice dated 08.04.2025; on receipt of the response, the concerned Passport Authorities to take a final decision in accordance with law; all pending application(s), if any, stand closed. ¶¶22

Satnam Singh Vs Union of India and Another — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

CWP-8371-2025 (O&M)

¶2

-1-

¶3

102

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

********

¶6

CWP-8371-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.04.2025

Satnam Singh

….Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and another

¶11

….Respondents

¶12

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER

¶13

Present : Mr. Karanjeet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶14

¶15

HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral)

¶16

The instant Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing respondent No.2 to issue passport to the petitioner. 2. Ms. Amrita Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondents, pursuant to the advance copy of petition having been sent to the Union of India and has handed over a photocopy of notice dated 08.04.2025 issued to the petitioner, by the Assistant Passport Officer, Amritsar, under Section 12 of the Passports Act, 1967, which is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions and also a copy of the same has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner in Court today itself.

¶17

2.1 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents further submits that till date, the petitioner has not responded to the said notice dated 08.04.2025.

¶18

HIMANI GUPTA 2025.04.25 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

¶19

-2-

¶20

CWP-8371-2025 (O&M)

¶21

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to respond to the notice dated 08.04.2025.

¶22

Ordered accordingly.

¶23

It goes without saying that, in case, the petitioner submits his response to the aforesaid notice dated 08.04.2025, then the concerned Passport Authorities shall proceed to take a final decision in the matter in accordance with law.

¶24

All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed.

¶25

25.04.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶26

HIMANI GUPTA 2025.04.25 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

Satnam Singh v. Union of India and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satnam Singh v. Union of India and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amrik Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Dalip Singh Vs Fc Appeals Pb and Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Others

Baba Gurpinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Riyast Ali Vs State of Haryana and Others

Om Parkash Vs Union of India and Anr.