Veena Vohra v. State of Haryhana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: family pension reduction; Article 226/227 Constitution of India; writ petition; notice of motion; stay of impugned order; interim order dated 22.10.2002 made absolute; liberty to revive within three months; pending applications disposed; Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh; Jagmohan Bansal, J.; CWP-16924-2002; decided orally on 03.09.2025; none for petitioner, State represented by DAG Haryana (Suneel Ranga).
What did the court decide?
Interim order dated 22.10.2002 made absolute; liberty reserved to the petitioner to move an appropriate application within three months if the cause survives; pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. ¶14