Disposed¶17

Kuldeep Singh v. State of Hry. and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC23 Sept 2025CWP/555/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pay scale revision; Articles 226/227 Constitution of India; res integra; Sarbans Singh v. State of Haryana CWP No.11710 of 2014 judgment dated 25.03.2025 Division Bench Punjab and Haryana; DAG concession of applicability; petition disposed with direction to consider claim in light of earlier judgment; compliance within three months; pending applications disposed; Kuldeep Singh v. State of Haryana; CWP-555-2007 (O&M); decided 23.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's claim for revision of pay scale (from Rs.1200-2040 to Rs.4000-6000) in the light of the Division Bench judgment dated 25.03.2025 in Sarbans Singh v. State of Haryana; the needful to be done within three months; pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. ¶17

Kuldeep Singh Vs State of Hry. and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, invoking Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is entitled to a direction to the respondent for revision of his pay scale from Rs.1200-2040 to Rs.4000-6000. +1 more

¶14

Court's answer

On the strength of the statements of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's claim in the light of the afore-cited judgment dated 25.03.2025 in Sarbans Singh.

¶17

Ratio / Principle

The issue raised in the petition is settled by the Division Bench judgment dated 25.03.2025 in Sarbans Singh and others v. State of Haryana (CWP No.11710 of 2014); the learned DAG, Haryana expressed his inability to controvert the applicability of that judgment to the instant petition.

¶16

Key takeaways

The needful pursuant to the direction shall be done within a period of three months.ratio¶21

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Punjab and Haryana High Court (Jagmohan Bansal, J., oral) disposed of CWP-555-2007 (O&M), filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India by Kuldeep Singh seeking direction for revision of pay scale from Rs.1200-2040 to Rs.4000-6000. Holding the issue no longer res integra in view of the Division Bench judgment dated 25.03.2025 in Sarbans Singh and others v. State of Haryana, CWP No.11710 of 2014, and noting that the DAG, Haryana expressed inability to controvert that judgment's applicability, the Court disposed of the petition with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's claim in the light of the said judgment within three months; pending applications stood disposed of.

¶1

204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

¶3

CWP-555-2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.09.2025

Kuldeep Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and Others

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

¶10

Present:Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG, Haryana.

¶12

¶13

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

¶14

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to grant him revision of pay scale from Rs.1200-2040 to Rs.4000-6000.

¶15

The petitioner claims that issue involved herein is no more res integra . A Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 25.03.2025 passed in a bunch of petitions including Civil Writ Petition No.11710 of 2014 titled as 'Sarbans Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana and others' has settled the issue.

¶16

Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG, Haryana expressed his inability to controvert applicability of abovesaid judgment to instant petitions.

¶17

In the wake of statement of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent to consider claim of petitioner in the light of afore-cited judgment.

¶18

PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.23 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

CWP-555-2007 (O&M)

¶20

-2-

¶21