Disposed¶20

Jayanti Ram v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC23 Sept 2025CWP/16550/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; CWP-16550-2006; Jayanti Ram v. State of Haryana and Others; Jagmohan Bansal, J. (oral); decided 23.09.2025; lien question pending before Supreme Court; SLP (C) Diary No(s). 40820 of 2024; State of Haryana v. ASI Jagpal Singh; withdrawal of benefit to private respondents; disposal on joint statement; direction to consider claim within three months; petitioner to inform authority of SLP outcome.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's claim within three months from the date of adjudication of SLP (Civil) Diary No(s). 40820 of 2024; petitioner placed under a duty to communicate the SLP's outcome to the concerned authority. ¶20

Jayanti Ram Vs State of Haryana and Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

¶3

CWP-16550-2006 Date of Decision: 23.09.2025

Jayanti Ram

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and Others

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

¶10

Present:Mr. Abhishek Kaushik, Advocate for

¶11

Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG, Haryana.

¶13

¶14

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Learned counsel representing the parties are ad idem that

¶16

question of lien is pending before Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s).40820 of 2024 titled as ‘ State of

¶17

Haryana and Others Versus ASI Jagpal Singh and Others’ .

¶18

Learned State counsel submits that benefit granted to private respondents has already been withdrawn, thus, grievance of petitioner qua benefit to private respondents stands redressed.

¶19

Learned counsel representing the parties are in tandom that outcome of aforesaid SLP would be applicable to the petitioner.

¶20

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent to consider claim of petitioner within three months from the date of adjudication of aforesaid SLP. It

¶21

PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.23 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶22

CWP-16550-2006

¶23

-2-

¶24

would be the duty of the petitioner to bring outcome of aforesaid SLP in

¶25

the knowledge of concerned authority.

¶26

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE