Anil Kumar and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: Haryana employees pay litigation; denial of higher pay scale/emolument; order dated 03.12.2020 by respondent No.1 (State of Haryana); increment; A.C.P.; promotion to higher post of Section Officer; from date of appointment; settled controversy; reliance on judgment dated 04.10.2024; batch of writ petitions; CWP-1281-2020; Shyam Sunder and others Vs. State of Haryana and others; State counsel unable to controvert; writ petition allowed in terms of earlier judgment; precedent followed; single-judge oral ruling; Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj; High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh; decision date 06.05.2025; petitioners' advocate Sanjeev Kodan; Addl. AG Haryana Rahul Dev.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition allowed in terms of the judgment dated 04.10.2024 passed in Shyam Sunder and others (CWP-1281-2020); petitioner to receive the benefit of higher pay scale/emolument alongwith consequential benefits (increment/A.C.P. promotion to the higher post of Section Officer) from the date of appointment, as adjudicated in that judgment.