Dismissed¶21

Krishan Lal v. Bhakra Bias Management Board & Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Aug 2025CWP/16527/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh | CWP-16527-2015 (O&M) | Krishan Lal v. Bhakra Beas Management Board and Others | Decided 25.08.2025 by Sandeep Moudgil J. | Subject: rejection of claim for Advance Promotional Increment by order dated 04.06.2014 (Annexure P-4); petition withdrawn after respondents No. 3 and 4's reply (clause 8(d): cases decided pursuant to court orders or executive instructions dated 26.05.1997 not to be reopened); dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek alternate remedy. Withdrawal case; no merits adjudicated; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner at liberty to seek alternate remedy in accordance with law, if still any right accrues. ¶21

Krishan Lal Vs Bhakra Bias Management Board & Anr. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

204

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CWP-16527-2015 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 25.08.2025

KRISHAN LAL

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

BHAKRA BEAS MANAGEMENT BOARD AND OTHERS

¶8

.....RESPONDENTS

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL

¶10

Present: Mr. Deepak Sonak, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Karan Nehra, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2

¶12

Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G. Haryana for respondents No. 3 and 4

¶13

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)

¶14

The present petition has been filed for quashing of the impugned order dated 04.06.2014 (Annexure P-4) vide which case of the petitioner for grant of Advance Promotional Increment has been rejected.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present petition as the petitioner is satisfied with the reply filed on respondent No. 3 and 4. The relevant portion of the reply is reproduced as below:

¶16

“8(d) The cases decided so far, either pursuant to the court orders or in terms of executive instructions dated 26.05.1997, should not be reopened.”

¶17

Prayer is accepted.

¶18

REENA 2025.08.28 03:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

CWP-16527-2015 (O&M)

¶20

-2-

¶21

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek alternate remedy in accordance with law, if still any

¶22

right accrues.