Satish Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Writ Petition (O&M) No.16342 of 2024, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, single judge (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal), decided 28.10.2025. Petitioner: Satish Kumar; Respondents: Union of India and others (including an unidentified respondent No. 7). Sole subject: consideration of Annexure P-7, the petitioner's application dated 04.11.2024; respondents' counsel undertook that the competent authority would look into the matter and address it within four weeks; petition and pending misc. applications disposed of on the statements of both sides. No statutes cited, no precedents cited, no quantum involved. Oral order; useful for monitoring enforcement of the recorded undertaking, not as a substantive-law precedent.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of on statements of both sides: respondents' competent authority to look into the matter and address the petitioner's Annexure P-7 (application dated 04.11.2024) within four weeks; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also disposed of.