Dismissed¶16
Ram Chander v. Hy.State & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/15278/2001
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Compulsory/earlier retirement at age 55 under Rule 9.18(1)(c) Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (as applicable to Haryana); retirement notice/order dated 13.06.2001 challenged by writ under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Court declined to set aside the retirement order and dismissed the petition (CWP-15278-2001, decided 27.10.2025, single bench of Jagmohan Bansal, J.); passing reference to pension at 50% of last drawn salary; no precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
This Court does not find it appropriate to set aside the order whereby the petitioner was made to retire at the age of 55 years. ¶15